Skip to content

Tony DeAngelo vs Jackson Blake

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Jackson Blake is ahead on 10 of 12 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Jackson Blake sits in the 90th percentile, Tony DeAngelo the 3rd.

MeasureDeAngeloBlake
Scoring · NHL
Points03
Goals00
Assists03
Ice time per game17:2918:53
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.0631 pct0.3086 pct
Shot attempts per game2.563 pct3.582 pct
Goals above expected−0.144 pct−1.22 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share51.2%49 pct53.3%55 pct
Chances for per 603.3085 pct2.8267 pct
Chances against per 603.1519 pct2.4742 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.493 pct+0.5490 pct
Creates per 60−0.0333 pct+0.4088 pct
Prevents per 60−0.461 pct+0.1577 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 555 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →