Skip to content

Alex Tuch vs Paul Cotter

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Alex Tuch is ahead on 8 of 13 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Alex Tuch sits in the 78th percentile, Paul Cotter the 24th.

MeasureTuchCotter
Scoring · NHL
Points26
Goals24
Assists02
Ice time per game17:1615:14
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.6498 pct0.2578 pct
Shot attempts per game4.087 pct2.046 pct
Goals above expected+0.786 pct+3.099 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share41.3%29 pct38.5%22 pct
Chances for per 601.6621 pct1.8932 pct
Chances against per 602.3646 pct3.0122 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.3678 pct−0.1024 pct
Creates per 60+0.2978 pct0.0039 pct
Prevents per 60+0.0761 pct−0.1123 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 519 skaters who have at least 18 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →