Nathan MacKinnon vs James Hagens
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Avalanche · CNathan MacKinnonChange first player
Avalanche skaters
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Martin Necas
- Artturi Lehkonen
- Nicolas Roy
- Jaden Schwartz
- Cale Makar
- Nazem Kadri
- T.J. Hughes
- Fedor Svechkov
- Sam Malinski
- Brock Nelson
- Parker Kelly
- Brent Burns
- Gabriel Landeskog
- Josh Manson
- Noah Juulsen
- Devon Toews
- Brett Kulak
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Tomas Hertl
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Kyle Connor
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- Adrian Kempe
- Jordan Eberle
- William Eklund
- Nick Schmaltz
- Cole Perfetti
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Dylan Guenther
- Clayton Keller
- William Nylander
- Will Smith
- Alex Tuch
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Sebastian Aho
- Marco Rossi
- Kirill Kaprizov
- JJ Peterka
- Artemi Panarin
- Sam Reinhart
Another club (its chance leader)
Bruins · CJames HagensChange second player
Bruins skaters
- JJ Peterka
- David Pastrnak
- Morgan Geekie
- James Hagens
- Pavel Zacha
- Casey Mittelstadt
- Fraser Minten
- Elias Lindholm
- Tanner Jeannot
- Sean Kuraly
- Nikita Zadorov
- Marat Khusnutdinov
- Jonathan Aspirot
- Mason Lohrei
- Connor Clifton
- Hampus Lindholm
- Will Borgen
- Mark Kastelic
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Tomas Hertl
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Kyle Connor
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- Adrian Kempe
- Jordan Eberle
- William Eklund
- Nick Schmaltz
- Cole Perfetti
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Dylan Guenther
- Clayton Keller
- William Nylander
- Will Smith
- Alex Tuch
- Sebastian Aho
- Marco Rossi
- Kirill Kaprizov
- JJ Peterka
- Artemi Panarin
- Sam Reinhart
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
Nathan MacKinnon is ahead on 11 of 13 measures. The widest gap is prevents per 60: James Hagens sits in the 99th percentile, Nathan MacKinnon the 35th.
| Measure | MacKinnon | Hagens |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 5 | 1 |
| Goals | 2 | 1 |
| Assists | 3 | 0 |
| Ice time per game | 18:00 | 13:48 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.6498 pct | 0.2780 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 7.599 pct | 2.354 pct |
| Goals above expected | +0.786 pct | +0.272 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | 63.4%82 pct | 53.3%54 pct |
| Chances for per 60 | 3.4889 pct | 1.8932 pct |
| Chances against per 60 | 2.0161 pct | 1.6678 pct |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | +1.2199 pct | +0.6392 pct |
| Creates per 60 | +1.2599 pct | +0.1052 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | −0.0335 pct | +0.5399 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 519 skaters who have at least 18 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →