Nathan MacKinnon vs Travis Sanheim
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Change first player
Avalanche skaters
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Martin Necas
- Artturi Lehkonen
- Nicolas Roy
- Jaden Schwartz
- Cale Makar
- Nazem Kadri
- T.J. Hughes
- Fedor Svechkov
- Sam Malinski
- Brock Nelson
- Parker Kelly
- Brent Burns
- Gabriel Landeskog
- Josh Manson
- Noah Juulsen
- Devon Toews
- Brett Kulak
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Tomas Hertl
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Kyle Connor
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- Adrian Kempe
- Jordan Eberle
- William Eklund
- Nick Schmaltz
- Cole Perfetti
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Dylan Guenther
- Clayton Keller
- William Nylander
- Will Smith
- Alex Tuch
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Sebastian Aho
- Marco Rossi
- Kirill Kaprizov
- JJ Peterka
- Artemi Panarin
- Sam Reinhart
Another club (its chance leader)
Change second player
Flyers skaters
- Tyson Foerster
- Trevor Zegras
- Alex Bump
- Travis Konecny
- Christian Dvorak
- Owen Tippett
- Matvei Michkov
- Noel Acciari
- Carl Grundstrom
- Rasmus Ristolainen
- Porter Martone
- Cam York
- Travis Sanheim
- Noah Cates
- Sean Couturier
- Nick Seeler
- David Jiricek
- Simon Benoit
- Jamie Drysdale
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Tomas Hertl
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Kyle Connor
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- Adrian Kempe
- Jordan Eberle
- William Eklund
- Nick Schmaltz
- Cole Perfetti
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Dylan Guenther
- Clayton Keller
- William Nylander
- Will Smith
- Alex Tuch
- Sebastian Aho
- Marco Rossi
- Kirill Kaprizov
- JJ Peterka
- Artemi Panarin
- Sam Reinhart
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
Nathan MacKinnon is ahead on 11 of 13 measures. The widest gap is chance share: Nathan MacKinnon sits in the 82nd percentile, Travis Sanheim the 6th.
| Measure | MacKinnon | Sanheim |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 5 | 2 |
| Goals | 2 | 1 |
| Assists | 3 | 1 |
| Ice time per game | 18:00 | 24:22 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.6498 pct | 0.0424 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 7.599 pct | 2.354 pct |
| Goals above expected | +0.786 pct | +0.991 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | 63.4%82 pct | 29.4%6 pct |
| Chances for per 60 | 3.4889 pct | 1.7023 pct |
| Chances against per 60 | 2.0161 pct | 4.095 pct |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | +1.2199 pct | +0.0747 pct |
| Creates per 60 | +1.2599 pct | +0.2067 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | −0.0335 pct | −0.1320 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 519 skaters who have at least 18 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →
