MacKenzie Weegar vs Kevin Stenlund
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Mammoth · DMacKenzie WeegarChange first player
Mammoth skaters
- Dylan Guenther
- Nick Schmaltz
- Clayton Keller
- Lawson Crouse
- Anders Lee
- Michael Carcone
- Logan Cooley
- Barrett Hayton
- Jack McBain
- Vincent Trocheck
- Daniil But
- MacKenzie Weegar
- Nate Schmidt
- Mikhail Sergachev
- Andrew Peeke
- Dmitri Simashev
- John Marino
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- Kyle Connor
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Alex Tuch
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Steven Stamkos
- Adrian Kempe
- Cole Perfetti
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Clayton Keller
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Tommy Novak
- Wyatt Johnston
Another club (its chance leader)
Mammoth · CKevin StenlundChange second player
Mammoth skaters
- Dylan Guenther
- Nick Schmaltz
- Clayton Keller
- Lawson Crouse
- Anders Lee
- Michael Carcone
- Logan Cooley
- Barrett Hayton
- Jack McBain
- Vincent Trocheck
- Daniil But
- Nate Schmidt
- Mikhail Sergachev
- Andrew Peeke
- Dmitri Simashev
- Kevin Stenlund
- John Marino
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- Kyle Connor
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Alex Tuch
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Steven Stamkos
- Adrian Kempe
- Cole Perfetti
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Clayton Keller
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Tommy Novak
- Wyatt Johnston
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
MacKenzie Weegar is ahead on 11 of 12 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: MacKenzie Weegar sits in the 65th percentile, Kevin Stenlund the 4th.
| Measure | Weegar | Stenlund |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 1 | 1 |
| Goals | 1 | 0 |
| Assists | 0 | 1 |
| Ice time per game | 20:49 | 14:00 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.0840 pct | 0.0214 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 3.073 pct | 1.015 pct |
| Goals above expected | +0.783 pct | −0.148 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | 63.6%84 pct | 45.2%32 pct |
| Chances for per 60 | 3.9397 pct | 2.0038 pct |
| Chances against per 60 | 2.2552 pct | 2.4344 pct |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | +0.2565 pct | −0.454 pct |
| Creates per 60 | +0.0949 pct | −0.402 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | +0.1679 pct | −0.0532 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 550 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →