Skip to content

Chandler Stephenson vs Chris Kreider

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Chandler Stephenson and Chris Kreider split the measures 5 each. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Chris Kreider sits in the 78th percentile, Chandler Stephenson the 4th.

MeasureStephensonKreider
Scoring · NHL
Points44
Goals11
Assists33
Ice time per game16:5714:36
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.1453 pct0.2579 pct
Shot attempts per game1.325 pct2.357 pct
Goals above expected+0.680 pct+0.270 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share59.1%70 pct32.8%11 pct
Chances for per 603.4689 pct1.8831 pct
Chances against per 602.3945 pct3.855 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.464 pct+0.3778 pct
Creates per 60−0.0626 pct+0.3179 pct
Prevents per 60−0.392 pct+0.0759 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 537 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →