Skip to content

Filip Forsberg vs Mason McTavish

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Filip Forsberg and Mason McTavish split the measures 6 each. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Filip Forsberg sits in the 75th percentile, Mason McTavish the 22nd.

MeasureForsbergMcTavish
Scoring · NHL
Points11
Goals01
Assists10
Ice time per game20:3514:47
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.1353 pct0.3690 pct
Shot attempts per game2.560 pct4.087 pct
Goals above expected−0.327 pct+0.374 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share46.9%42 pct48.2%45 pct
Chances for per 602.0137 pct2.4154 pct
Chances against per 602.2750 pct2.5936 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.3475 pct−0.1322 pct
Creates per 60+0.4188 pct+0.2472 pct
Prevents per 60−0.0730 pct−0.372 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 519 skaters who have at least 18 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →