Skip to content

Jacob Trouba vs Mark Stone

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Mark Stone is ahead on 7 of 12 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Mark Stone sits in the 82nd percentile, Jacob Trouba the 22nd.

MeasureTroubaStone
Scoring · NHL
Points12
Goals01
Assists11
Ice time per game21:4219:12
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.0421 pct0.1764 pct
Shot attempts per game3.072 pct1.018 pct
Goals above expected−0.152 pct−0.513 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share40.0%25 pct39.9%25 pct
Chances for per 601.5216 pct1.8128 pct
Chances against per 602.2850 pct2.7332 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.1322 pct+0.4182 pct
Creates per 60−0.1023 pct+0.1965 pct
Prevents per 60−0.0435 pct+0.2288 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 519 skaters who have at least 18 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →