Skip to content

Tom Wilson vs Egor Chinakhov

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Egor Chinakhov is ahead on 5 of 9 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Tom Wilson sits in the 92nd percentile, Egor Chinakhov the 39th.

MeasureWilsonChinakhov
Scoring · NHL
Points12
Goals01
Assists11
Ice time per game17:1316:19
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.1455 pct0.2477 pct
Shot attempts per game1.531 pct2.766 pct
Goals above expected−0.329 pct+0.370 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share—51.6%50 pct
Chances for per 60—2.1544 pct
Chances against per 60—2.0262 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.6092 pct+0.0239 pct
Creates per 60+0.3181 pct−0.0234 pct
Prevents per 60+0.2892 pct+0.0452 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 543 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →