Skip to content

Zemgus Girgensons vs Matthew Schaefer

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Matthew Schaefer is ahead on 10 of 12 measures. The widest gap is shot attempts per game: Matthew Schaefer sits in the 93rd percentile, Zemgus Girgensons the 10th.

MeasureGirgensonsSchaefer
Scoring · NHL
Points12
Goals00
Assists12
Ice time per game12:1024:10
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.0525 pct0.1352 pct
Shot attempts per game0.710 pct5.093 pct
Goals above expected−0.141 pct−0.329 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share53.5%55 pct58.7%67 pct
Chances for per 603.2783 pct2.4855 pct
Chances against per 602.8426 pct1.7574 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.0238 pct+0.4685 pct
Creates per 60−0.0627 pct+0.3382 pct
Prevents per 60+0.0863 pct+0.1373 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 540 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →