Skip to content

Scott Laughton vs Konsta Helenius

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Konsta Helenius is ahead on 11 of 12 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Konsta Helenius sits in the 99th percentile, Scott Laughton the 25th.

MeasureLaughtonHelenius
Scoring · NHL
Points01
Goals01
Assists00
Ice time per game14:1914:54
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.1968 pct0.3084 pct
Shot attempts per game2.560 pct3.579 pct
Goals above expected−0.419 pct+0.477 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share46.7%41 pct62.6%80 pct
Chances for per 603.2885 pct2.9874 pct
Chances against per 603.748 pct1.7871 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.0925 pct+1.0099 pct
Creates per 60−0.0333 pct+0.7498 pct
Prevents per 60−0.0632 pct+0.2691 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 519 skaters who have at least 18 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →