Scott Laughton vs Anders Lee
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Kings · CScott LaughtonChange first player
Kings skaters
- Adrian Kempe
- Artemi Panarin
- Quinton Byfield
- Alex Laferriere
- Scott Laughton
- Erik Haula
- Alex Turcotte
- Andre Lee
- Trevor Moore
- Joel Armia
- Mats Zuccarello
- Corey Perry
- Cody Ceci
- Mikey Anderson
- Brandt Clarke
- Brian Dumoulin
- Drew Doughty
- Samuel Helenius
- Erik Gustafsson
- Joel Edmundson
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tage Thompson
- William Eklund
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Kyle Connor
- Tomas Hertl
- William Nylander
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Steven Stamkos
- Kirill Marchenko
- John Tavares
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- Adrian Kempe
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Auston Matthews
- Sebastian Aho
- Nick Schmaltz
- Brandon Hagel
- Morgan Geekie
- Will Smith
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Matt Boldy
Another club (its chance leader)
Mammoth · LAnders LeeChange second player
Mammoth skaters
- Nick Schmaltz
- Dylan Guenther
- Clayton Keller
- Anders Lee
- Michael Carcone
- Lawson Crouse
- Logan Cooley
- Barrett Hayton
- Jack McBain
- Daniil But
- Vincent Trocheck
- Mikhail Sergachev
- Andrew Peeke
- MacKenzie Weegar
- Nate Schmidt
- Dmitri Simashev
- John Marino
- Kevin Stenlund
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tage Thompson
- William Eklund
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Kyle Connor
- Tomas Hertl
- William Nylander
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Steven Stamkos
- Kirill Marchenko
- John Tavares
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- Adrian Kempe
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Auston Matthews
- Sebastian Aho
- Nick Schmaltz
- Brandon Hagel
- Morgan Geekie
- Will Smith
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Matt Boldy
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
Anders Lee is ahead on 11 of 13 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Anders Lee sits in the 92nd percentile, Scott Laughton the 25th.
| Measure | Laughton | Lee |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 0 | 2 |
| Goals | 0 | 1 |
| Assists | 0 | 1 |
| Ice time per game | 14:19 | 12:58 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.1969 pct | 0.3489 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 2.562 pct | 3.379 pct |
| Goals above expected | −0.421 pct | 0.060 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | 46.7%41 pct | 53.0%55 pct |
| Chances for per 60 | 3.2884 pct | 3.2382 pct |
| Chances against per 60 | 3.749 pct | 2.8726 pct |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | −0.0925 pct | +0.6292 pct |
| Creates per 60 | −0.0332 pct | +0.5695 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | −0.0631 pct | +0.0656 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 553 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →