Skip to content

Barclay Goodrow vs Jake Sanderson

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Jake Sanderson is ahead on 4 of 7 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Jake Sanderson sits in the 50th percentile, Barclay Goodrow the 3rd.

MeasureGoodrowSanderson
Scoring · NHL
Points00
Goals00
Assists00
Ice time per game13:064:29
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.016 pct0.001 pct
Shot attempts per game0.34 pct0.01 pct
Goals above expected0.061 pct0.067 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share35.5%16 pct—
Chances for per 601.5818 pct—
Chances against per 602.8725 pct—
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.473 pct+0.1150 pct
Creates per 60−0.315 pct+0.0746 pct
Prevents per 60−0.1616 pct+0.0452 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 540 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →