Jonathan Marchessault vs Jackson LaCombe
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Predators · RJonathan MarchessaultChange first player
Predators skaters
- Steven Stamkos
- Nils Hoglander
- Adam Edstrom
- Matthew Wood
- Filip Forsberg
- Ryan O'Reilly
- Mavrik Bourque
- Nick Perbix
- Jonathan Marchessault
- Roman Josi
- Adam Wilsby
- Ross Colton
- Alexander Kerfoot
- William Trudeau
- Reid Schaefer
- Nicolas Hague
- Brady Skjei
- Jack Drury
- Ryan Ufko
- Jack Ahcan
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Kyle Connor
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Steven Stamkos
- Adrian Kempe
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Clayton Keller
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Auston Matthews
- Sebastian Aho
Another club (its chance leader)
Ducks · DJackson LaCombeChange second player
Ducks skaters
- Cutter Gauthier
- Beckett Sennecke
- Mikael Granlund
- A.J. Greer
- Ryan Poehling
- Leo Carlsson
- Jackson LaCombe
- Tristan Luneau
- Pavel Mintyukov
- Tyson Hinds
- Jeff Malott
- Alex Killorn
- Tim Washe
- Nikita Nesterenko
- Sam Colangelo
- Noah Warren
- Frank Vatrano
- Judd Caulfield
- Travis Mitchell
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Kyle Connor
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Steven Stamkos
- Adrian Kempe
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Clayton Keller
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Auston Matthews
- Sebastian Aho
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
Jackson LaCombe is ahead on 10 of 12 measures. The widest gap is prevents per 60: Jackson LaCombe sits in the 95th percentile, Jonathan Marchessault the 8th.
| Measure | Marchessault | LaCombe |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 0 | 2 |
| Goals | 0 | 0 |
| Assists | 0 | 2 |
| Ice time per game | 15:40 | 29:09 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.0836 pct | 0.1660 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 3.073 pct | 2.047 pct |
| Goals above expected | −0.233 pct | −0.326 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | 32.3%10 pct | 46.2%37 pct |
| Chances for per 60 | 1.197 pct | 1.9737 pct |
| Chances against per 60 | 2.4940 pct | 2.2949 pct |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | −0.1819 pct | +0.4584 pct |
| Creates per 60 | +0.0747 pct | +0.1359 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | −0.258 pct | +0.3195 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 543 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →