Phillip Danault vs Cole Perfetti
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Canadiens · CPhillip DanaultChange first player
Canadiens skaters
- Josh Anderson
- Chris Kreider
- Nick Suzuki
- Zachary Bolduc
- Phillip Danault
- Cole Caufield
- Juraj Slafkovský
- Jake Evans
- Alex Newhook
- Mike Matheson
- Ivan Demidov
- Lane Hutson
- Noah Dobson
- Alexandre Carrier
- Alexandre Texier
- Florian Xhekaj
- Kirby Dach
- Jayden Struble
- Arber Xhekaj
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tage Thompson
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Kyle Connor
- Tomas Hertl
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Steven Stamkos
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Clayton Keller
- Adrian Kempe
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Auston Matthews
- Sebastian Aho
- Jack Hughes
Another club (its chance leader)
Jets · CCole PerfettiChange second player
Jets skaters
- Kyle Connor
- Cole Perfetti
- Gabriel Vilardi
- Mark Scheifele
- Josh Morrissey
- Vladislav Namestnikov
- Viggo Björck
- Alex Iafallo
- Morgan Barron
- Brad Lambert
- Neal Pionk
- Adam Lowry
- Cole Koepke
- Mario Ferraro
- Isak Rosen
- Dylan Samberg
- Dylan DeMelo
- Tyrel Bauer
- Nino Niederreiter
- Jack St. Ivany
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tage Thompson
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Kyle Connor
- Tomas Hertl
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Steven Stamkos
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Clayton Keller
- Adrian Kempe
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Auston Matthews
- Sebastian Aho
- Jack Hughes
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
Cole Perfetti is ahead on 11 of 13 measures. The widest gap is chances against per 60: Phillip Danault sits in the 92nd percentile, Cole Perfetti the 19th.
| Measure | Danault | Perfetti |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 1 | 5 |
| Goals | 0 | 2 |
| Assists | 1 | 3 |
| Ice time per game | 13:37 | 18:05 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.2272 pct | 0.5397 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 1.736 pct | 6.097 pct |
| Goals above expected | −0.710 pct | +0.474 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | 59.2%70 pct | 51.2%49 pct |
| Chances for per 60 | 1.8731 pct | 3.2081 pct |
| Chances against per 60 | 1.2892 pct | 3.0519 pct |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | +0.0542 pct | +0.2768 pct |
| Creates per 60 | +0.0242 pct | +0.1458 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | +0.0248 pct | +0.1476 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 537 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →