Skip to content

Connor Murphy vs Chris Tanev

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Connor Murphy and Chris Tanev split the measures 5 each. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Chris Tanev sits in the 70th percentile, Connor Murphy the 16th.

MeasureMurphyTanev
Scoring · NHL
Points00
Goals00
Assists00
Ice time per game20:5218:55
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.019 pct0.015 pct
Shot attempts per game1.327 pct0.33 pct
Goals above expected0.059 pct0.063 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share43.1%32 pct39.1%23 pct
Chances for per 602.3954 pct1.9536 pct
Chances against per 603.1618 pct3.0421 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.1916 pct+0.2970 pct
Creates per 60−0.2210 pct−0.2112 pct
Prevents per 60+0.0351 pct+0.4999 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 519 skaters who have at least 18 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →