Skip to content

Joel Armia vs Stephen Halliday

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Joel Armia is ahead on 4 of 7 measures. The widest gap is creates per 60: Stephen Halliday sits in the 92nd percentile, Joel Armia the 25th.

MeasureArmiaHalliday
Scoring · NHL
Points11
Goals11
Assists00
Ice time per game13:1110:08
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.1045 pct0.2883 pct
Shot attempts per game2.562 pct2.357 pct
Goals above expected+0.887 pct+0.268 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share—54.2%59 pct
Chances for per 60—4.4198 pct
Chances against per 60—3.727 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.0234 pct+0.3879 pct
Creates per 60−0.0725 pct+0.5092 pct
Prevents per 60+0.0555 pct−0.1222 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 537 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →