Mika Zibanejad vs Cale Makar
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Change first player
Rangers skaters
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- Alexis Lafrenière
- Will Cuylle
- Mika Zibanejad
- J.T. Miller
- Gabe Perreault
- Eeli Tolvanen
- Oliver Bjorkstrand
- Tye Kartye
- Jaroslav Chmelar
- Adam Fox
- Sean Durzi
- Noah Laba
- Braden Schneider
- Joseph Veleno
- Marcus Pettersson
- Vladislav Gavrikov
- Matt Rempe
- Alberts Smits
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Kyle Connor
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Tomas Hertl
- Vasily Podkolzin
- William Eklund
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- Adrian Kempe
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Nick Schmaltz
- Brandon Hagel
- Morgan Geekie
- Will Smith
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Dylan Guenther
- Tyson Foerster
- Clayton Keller
- William Nylander
- Gabriel Vilardi
- Alex Tuch
- Nathan MacKinnon
- David Pastrnak
Another club (its chance leader)
Change second player
Avalanche skaters
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Martin Necas
- Artturi Lehkonen
- Nicolas Roy
- Jaden Schwartz
- Cale Makar
- Nazem Kadri
- T.J. Hughes
- Fedor Svechkov
- Sam Malinski
- Brock Nelson
- Parker Kelly
- Brent Burns
- Gabriel Landeskog
- Josh Manson
- Noah Juulsen
- Devon Toews
- Brett Kulak
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Kyle Connor
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Tomas Hertl
- Vasily Podkolzin
- William Eklund
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- Adrian Kempe
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Nick Schmaltz
- Brandon Hagel
- Morgan Geekie
- Will Smith
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Dylan Guenther
- Tyson Foerster
- Clayton Keller
- William Nylander
- Gabriel Vilardi
- Alex Tuch
- Nathan MacKinnon
- David Pastrnak
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
Cale Makar is ahead on 7 of 9 measures. The widest gap is prevents per 60: Cale Makar sits in the 79th percentile, Mika Zibanejad the 44th.
| Measure | Zibanejad | Makar |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 3 | 3 |
| Goals | 1 | 1 |
| Assists | 2 | 2 |
| Ice time per game | 20:49 | 19:09 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.2476 pct | 0.2780 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 2.560 pct | 2.560 pct |
| Goals above expected | 0.068 pct | +0.578 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | 57.1%63 pct | 70.7%93 pct |
| Chances for per 60 | 2.6962 pct | 3.3085 pct |
| Chances against per 60 | 2.0261 pct | 1.3790 pct |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | −0.0431 pct | +0.0645 pct |
| Creates per 60 | −0.0430 pct | −0.0924 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | +0.0144 pct | +0.1679 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 540 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →
