Skip to content

Gabriel Landeskog vs Isaac Howard

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Gabriel Landeskog is ahead on 10 of 12 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Gabriel Landeskog sits in the 91st percentile, Isaac Howard the 7th.

MeasureLandeskogHoward
Scoring · NHL
Points21
Goals10
Assists11
Ice time per game16:1410:09
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.0320 pct0.1147 pct
Shot attempts per game0.57 pct1.739 pct
Goals above expected+0.994 pct−0.322 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share58.7%68 pct21.3%3 pct
Chances for per 603.3787 pct1.148 pct
Chances against per 602.3745 pct4.244 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.5991 pct−0.377 pct
Creates per 60+0.2877 pct−0.2211 pct
Prevents per 60+0.3194 pct−0.1517 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 519 skaters who have at least 18 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →