Skip to content

Joel Edmundson vs Matthew Schaefer

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Matthew Schaefer is ahead on 9 of 12 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Matthew Schaefer sits in the 85th percentile, Joel Edmundson the 3rd.

MeasureEdmundsonSchaefer
Scoring · NHL
Points02
Goals00
Assists02
Ice time per game14:2624:10
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.018 pct0.1353 pct
Shot attempts per game1.018 pct5.093 pct
Goals above expected0.062 pct−0.329 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share69.7%91 pct58.7%67 pct
Chances for per 602.2245 pct2.4857 pct
Chances against per 600.9796 pct1.7573 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.493 pct+0.4685 pct
Creates per 60−0.491 pct+0.3382 pct
Prevents per 600.0042 pct+0.1374 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 532 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →