Skip to content

Joel Edmundson vs Gabriel Landeskog

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Gabriel Landeskog is ahead on 10 of 13 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Gabriel Landeskog sits in the 91st percentile, Joel Edmundson the 3rd.

MeasureEdmundsonLandeskog
Scoring · NHL
Points02
Goals01
Assists01
Ice time per game14:2616:14
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.018 pct0.0319 pct
Shot attempts per game1.017 pct0.57 pct
Goals above expected0.061 pct+0.994 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share69.7%91 pct58.7%67 pct
Chances for per 602.2243 pct3.3787 pct
Chances against per 600.9796 pct2.3745 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.493 pct+0.5991 pct
Creates per 60−0.491 pct+0.2877 pct
Prevents per 600.0042 pct+0.3194 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 540 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →