Skip to content

Joel Edmundson vs Mark Stone

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Mark Stone is ahead on 10 of 13 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Mark Stone sits in the 85th percentile, Joel Edmundson the 3rd.

MeasureEdmundsonStone
Scoring · NHL
Points04
Goals02
Assists02
Ice time per game14:0318:22
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.0629 pct0.2984 pct
Shot attempts per game2.047 pct2.353 pct
Goals above expected−0.239 pct−0.142 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share66.1%88 pct51.2%49 pct
Chances for per 602.4153 pct2.2948 pct
Chances against per 601.2393 pct2.1855 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.463 pct+0.4785 pct
Creates per 60−0.461 pct+0.2169 pct
Prevents per 600.0042 pct+0.2691 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 543 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →