Skip to content

Nick Seeler vs Josh Samanski

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Josh Samanski is ahead on 4 of 7 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Josh Samanski sits in the 58th percentile, Nick Seeler the 32nd.

MeasureSeelerSamanski
Scoring · NHL
Points00
Goals00
Assists00
Ice time per game17:357:30
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.017 pct0.0420 pct
Shot attempts per game0.33 pct0.57 pct
Goals above expected0.061 pct−0.153 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share19.7%2 pct—
Chances for per 600.681 pct—
Chances against per 602.7629 pct—
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.0432 pct+0.1658 pct
Creates per 60−0.1914 pct−0.277 pct
Prevents per 60+0.1579 pct+0.4298 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 519 skaters who have at least 18 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →