Josh Manson vs Travis Sanheim
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Change first player
Avalanche skaters
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Martin Necas
- Jaden Schwartz
- Nicolas Roy
- Artturi Lehkonen
- Cale Makar
- Fedor Svechkov
- Nazem Kadri
- T.J. Hughes
- Sam Malinski
- Gabriel Landeskog
- Brock Nelson
- Brent Burns
- Parker Kelly
- Devon Toews
- Zachary L'Heureux
- Brett Kulak
- Josh Manson
- Noah Juulsen
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- Kyle Connor
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Alex Tuch
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Steven Stamkos
- Adrian Kempe
- Cole Perfetti
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Clayton Keller
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Tommy Novak
- Wyatt Johnston
Another club (its chance leader)
Change second player
Flyers skaters
- Tyson Foerster
- Trevor Zegras
- Christian Dvorak
- Travis Konecny
- Alex Bump
- Matvei Michkov
- Owen Tippett
- Noel Acciari
- Carl Grundstrom
- Rasmus Ristolainen
- Cam York
- Porter Martone
- Travis Sanheim
- David Jiricek
- Noah Cates
- Sean Couturier
- Nick Seeler
- Simon Benoit
- Denver Barkey
- Jamie Drysdale
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- Kyle Connor
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Alex Tuch
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Steven Stamkos
- Adrian Kempe
- Cole Perfetti
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Clayton Keller
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Tommy Novak
- Wyatt Johnston
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
Josh Manson is ahead on 8 of 12 measures. The widest gap is chance share: Josh Manson sits in the 91st percentile, Travis Sanheim the 6th.
| Measure | Manson | Sanheim |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 3 | 2 |
| Goals | 1 | 1 |
| Assists | 2 | 1 |
| Ice time per game | 16:01 | 24:33 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.029 pct | 0.0421 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 1.015 pct | 2.354 pct |
| Goals above expected | +0.994 pct | +0.890 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | 67.1%91 pct | 28.2%6 pct |
| Chances for per 60 | 4.1398 pct | 1.6019 pct |
| Chances against per 60 | 2.0363 pct | 4.073 pct |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | +0.1151 pct | +0.0340 pct |
| Creates per 60 | −0.0235 pct | +0.1965 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | +0.1372 pct | −0.1616 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 550 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →
