Mikael Granlund vs Tommy Novak
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Change first player
Ducks skaters
- Beckett Sennecke
- Cutter Gauthier
- Mikael Granlund
- A.J. Greer
- Ryan Poehling
- Leo Carlsson
- Jackson LaCombe
- Alex Killorn
- Tristan Luneau
- Jeff Malott
- Tim Washe
- Travis Mitchell
- Pavel Mintyukov
- Nikita Nesterenko
- Tyson Hinds
- Judd Caulfield
- Sam Colangelo
- Noah Warren
- Frank Vatrano
- Nikita Klepov
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- Kyle Connor
- Vasily Podkolzin
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Alex Tuch
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Steven Stamkos
- Adrian Kempe
- Cole Perfetti
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Beckett Sennecke
- Clayton Keller
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Cutter Gauthier
Another club (its chance leader)
Change second player
Penguins skaters
- Tommy Novak
- Egor Chinakhov
- Sidney Crosby
- Evgeni Malkin
- Rickard Rakell
- Ben Kindel
- Filip Hallander
- Blake Lizotte
- Samuel Girard
- Nick Robertson
- Connor Dewar
- Kris Letang
- Hendrix Lapierre
- Declan Carlile
- Ville Koivunen
- Kaedan Korczak
- Erik Karlsson
- Bryan Rust
- Andrei Kuzmenko
- Elmer Soderblom
- Trevor van Riemsdyk
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- Kyle Connor
- Vasily Podkolzin
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Alex Tuch
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Steven Stamkos
- Adrian Kempe
- Cole Perfetti
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Beckett Sennecke
- Clayton Keller
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Cutter Gauthier
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
Tommy Novak is ahead on 9 of 12 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Tommy Novak sits in the 97th percentile, Mikael Granlund the 51st.
| Measure | Granlund | Novak |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 3 | 5 |
| Goals | 1 | 3 |
| Assists | 2 | 2 |
| Ice time per game | 20:54 | 15:19 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.3086 pct | 0.4294 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 3.380 pct | 2.562 pct |
| Goals above expected | +0.166 pct | +1.396 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | 54.9%62 pct | 55.3%62 pct |
| Chances for per 60 | 1.8128 pct | 2.6863 pct |
| Chances against per 60 | 1.4987 pct | 2.1656 pct |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | +0.1151 pct | +0.7597 pct |
| Creates per 60 | +0.2269 pct | +0.6898 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | −0.1024 pct | +0.0861 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 555 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →
