Skip to content

Erik Gudbranson vs Esa Lindell

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Esa Lindell is ahead on 8 of 10 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Esa Lindell sits in the 73rd percentile, Erik Gudbranson the 2nd.

MeasureGudbransonLindell
Scoring · NHL
Points00
Goals00
Assists00
Ice time per game17:1018:56
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.003 pct0.0319 pct
Shot attempts per game0.56 pct1.017 pct
Goals above expected0.065 pct−0.146 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share46.6%39 pct59.8%71 pct
Chances for per 601.5317 pct3.3186 pct
Chances against per 601.7575 pct2.2353 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.512 pct+0.3273 pct
Creates per 60−0.511 pct+0.1050 pct
Prevents per 600.0042 pct+0.2388 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 542 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →