Skip to content

Erik Gudbranson vs Stefan Noesen

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Stefan Noesen is ahead on 5 of 7 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Stefan Noesen sits in the 56th percentile, Erik Gudbranson the 2nd.

MeasureGudbransonNoesen
Scoring · NHL
Points00
Goals00
Assists00
Ice time per game17:107:24
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.003 pct0.0214 pct
Shot attempts per game0.57 pct1.017 pct
Goals above expected0.065 pct0.057 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share46.6%39 pct—
Chances for per 601.5317 pct—
Chances against per 601.7574 pct—
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.512 pct+0.1656 pct
Creates per 60−0.511 pct+0.1355 pct
Prevents per 600.0042 pct+0.0450 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 540 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →