Jaden Schwartz vs Emil Heineman
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Change first player
Avalanche skaters
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Martin Necas
- Artturi Lehkonen
- Nicolas Roy
- Jaden Schwartz
- Cale Makar
- Nazem Kadri
- T.J. Hughes
- Fedor Svechkov
- Sam Malinski
- Brock Nelson
- Parker Kelly
- Brent Burns
- Gabriel Landeskog
- Josh Manson
- Noah Juulsen
- Devon Toews
- Brett Kulak
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Kyle Connor
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Steven Stamkos
- Adrian Kempe
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Clayton Keller
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Auston Matthews
- Sebastian Aho
Another club (its chance leader)
Change second player
Islanders skaters
- Bo Horvat
- Brayden Schenn
- Casey Cizikas
- Ondrej Palat
- Victor Eklund
- Kyle Palmieri
- Emil Heineman
- Calum Ritchie
- Anthony Duclair
- Simon Holmstrom
- Matthew Schaefer
- Matias Maccelli
- Tony DeAngelo
- Jean-Gabriel Pageau
- Ryan Pulock
- Alexander Romanov
- Adam Pelech
- Logan Stanley
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Kyle Connor
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Steven Stamkos
- Adrian Kempe
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Clayton Keller
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Auston Matthews
- Sebastian Aho
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
Jaden Schwartz is ahead on 7 of 10 measures. The widest gap is goals above expected: Emil Heineman sits in the 72nd percentile, Jaden Schwartz the 10th.
| Measure | Schwartz | Heineman |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 2 | 1 |
| Goals | 0 | 1 |
| Assists | 2 | 0 |
| Ice time per game | 13:32 | 15:33 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.3590 pct | 0.2274 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 2.562 pct | 1.736 pct |
| Goals above expected | −0.710 pct | +0.372 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | — | 39.2%21 pct |
| Chances for per 60 | — | 2.1745 pct |
| Chances against per 60 | — | 3.3812 pct |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | +0.3577 pct | −0.0629 pct |
| Creates per 60 | +0.2877 pct | −0.0627 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | +0.0760 pct | 0.0043 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 543 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →
