Jaden Schwartz vs Steven Stamkos
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Avalanche · LJaden SchwartzChange first player
Avalanche skaters
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Martin Necas
- Jaden Schwartz
- Nicolas Roy
- Artturi Lehkonen
- Cale Makar
- Fedor Svechkov
- Nazem Kadri
- T.J. Hughes
- Sam Malinski
- Gabriel Landeskog
- Brock Nelson
- Brent Burns
- Parker Kelly
- Devon Toews
- Zachary L'Heureux
- Brett Kulak
- Josh Manson
- Noah Juulsen
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- Kyle Connor
- Vasily Podkolzin
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Alex Tuch
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Adrian Kempe
- Cole Perfetti
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Beckett Sennecke
- Clayton Keller
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Cutter Gauthier
Another club (its chance leader)
Predators · CSteven StamkosChange second player
Predators skaters
- Steven Stamkos
- Nils Hoglander
- Adam Edstrom
- Matthew Wood
- Filip Forsberg
- Ryan O'Reilly
- Mavrik Bourque
- Nick Perbix
- Jonathan Marchessault
- Roman Josi
- Adam Wilsby
- Ross Colton
- Alexander Kerfoot
- William Trudeau
- Reid Schaefer
- Nicolas Hague
- Brady Skjei
- Jack Drury
- Ryan Ufko
- Jack Ahcan
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- Kyle Connor
- Vasily Podkolzin
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Alex Tuch
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Steven Stamkos
- Adrian Kempe
- Cole Perfetti
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Beckett Sennecke
- Clayton Keller
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Cutter Gauthier
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
Jaden Schwartz is ahead on 7 of 12 measures. The widest gap is chances for per 60: Jaden Schwartz sits in the 96th percentile, Steven Stamkos the 29th.
| Measure | Schwartz | Stamkos |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 4 | 4 |
| Goals | 1 | 3 |
| Assists | 3 | 1 |
| Ice time per game | 13:27 | 19:30 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.3389 pct | 0.6599 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 2.766 pct | 4.793 pct |
| Goals above expected | 0.065 pct | +1.094 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | 66.8%90 pct | 47.2%40 pct |
| Chances for per 60 | 3.8596 pct | 1.8529 pct |
| Chances against per 60 | 1.9267 pct | 2.0761 pct |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | +0.3878 pct | +0.2970 pct |
| Creates per 60 | +0.3079 pct | +0.2978 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | +0.0861 pct | 0.0042 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 555 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →