Skip to content

Justin Faulk vs Macklin Celebrini

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Macklin Celebrini is ahead on 10 of 12 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Macklin Celebrini sits in the 88th percentile, Justin Faulk the 1st.

MeasureFaulkCelebrini
Scoring · NHL
Points05
Goals00
Assists05
Ice time per game20:3122:20
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.1354 pct0.2272 pct
Shot attempts per game2.560 pct5.595 pct
Goals above expected−0.327 pct−0.416 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share43.8%33 pct53.3%54 pct
Chances for per 601.7425 pct1.5918 pct
Chances against per 602.2352 pct1.3989 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.591 pct+0.5388 pct
Creates per 60−0.581 pct+0.2978 pct
Prevents per 60−0.0140 pct+0.2389 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 519 skaters who have at least 18 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →