Skip to content

Chris Tanev vs Max Crozier

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Chris Tanev is ahead on 4 of 7 measures. The widest gap is shot attempts per game: Max Crozier sits in the 73rd percentile, Chris Tanev the 2nd.

MeasureTanevCrozier
Scoring · NHL
Points00
Goals00
Assists00
Ice time per game18:5115:24
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.003 pct0.1146 pct
Shot attempts per game0.32 pct3.073 pct
Goals above expected0.062 pct−0.147 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share38.4%20 pct—
Chances for per 602.0941 pct—
Chances against per 603.3512 pct—
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.2364 pct+0.1050 pct
Creates per 60−0.2013 pct−0.1320 pct
Prevents per 60+0.4498 pct+0.2388 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 543 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →