Skip to content

Marcus Foligno vs Zach Whitecloud

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Marcus Foligno is ahead on 8 of 10 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Marcus Foligno sits in the 94th percentile, Zach Whitecloud the 34th.

MeasureFolignoWhitecloud
Scoring · NHL
Points00
Goals00
Assists00
Ice time per game12:1021:05
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.1865 pct0.0319 pct
Shot attempts per game1.533 pct1.018 pct
Goals above expected−0.420 pct−0.148 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share60.3%73 pct46.3%39 pct
Chances for per 602.1343 pct1.6120 pct
Chances against per 601.4088 pct1.8768 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.6694 pct−0.0334 pct
Creates per 60+0.2876 pct−0.1517 pct
Prevents per 60+0.3897 pct+0.1272 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 519 skaters who have at least 18 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →