Marcus Foligno vs Cam Fowler
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Change first player
Wild skaters
- Matt Boldy
- Kirill Kaprizov
- Quinn Hughes
- Blake Coleman
- Joel Eriksson Ek
- Maxim Shabanov
- Bobby Brink
- Marcus Foligno
- Danila Yurov
- Michael McCarron
- Nick Foligno
- Yakov Trenin
- Ryan Hartman
- Olli Maatta
- Jared Spurgeon
- Daemon Hunt
- Zach Bogosian
- Jonas Brodin
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Kyle Connor
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Steven Stamkos
- Adrian Kempe
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Clayton Keller
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Auston Matthews
- Sebastian Aho
Another club (its chance leader)
Change second player
Blues skaters
- Mason McTavish
- Connor McMichael
- Dalibor Dvorsky
- Dylan Holloway
- Pavel Buchnevich
- Adam Jiricek
- Jimmy Snuggerud
- Robert Thomas
- Jonatan Berggren
- Philip Broberg
- Colton Parayko
- Jake Neighbours
- Pius Suter
- Ross Johnston
- Cam Fowler
- Brandon Carlo
- Theo Lindstein
- Dillon Dube
- Alexey Toropchenko
- Zach Dean
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Kyle Connor
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Steven Stamkos
- Adrian Kempe
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Clayton Keller
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Auston Matthews
- Sebastian Aho
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
Cam Fowler is ahead on 6 of 10 measures. The widest gap is chance share: Cam Fowler sits in the 84th percentile, Marcus Foligno the 16th.
| Measure | Foligno | Fowler |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 0 | 0 |
| Goals | 0 | 0 |
| Assists | 0 | 0 |
| Ice time per game | 12:35 | 23:02 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.1250 pct | 0.0423 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 1.325 pct | 2.047 pct |
| Goals above expected | −0.422 pct | −0.144 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | 36.5%16 pct | 64.0%84 pct |
| Chances for per 60 | 1.4514 pct | 2.7465 pct |
| Chances against per 60 | 2.5338 pct | 1.5485 pct |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | +0.5891 pct | +0.1252 pct |
| Creates per 60 | +0.2574 pct | +0.0139 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | +0.3396 pct | +0.1270 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 543 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →
