Skip to content

Chris Kreider vs Justin Faulk

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Chris Kreider and Justin Faulk split the measures 6 each. The widest gap is creates per 60: Chris Kreider sits in the 79th percentile, Justin Faulk the 1st.

MeasureKreiderFaulk
Scoring · NHL
Points42
Goals11
Assists31
Ice time per game14:3619:47
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.2579 pct0.1353 pct
Shot attempts per game2.358 pct3.073 pct
Goals above expected+0.269 pct+0.682 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share32.8%12 pct60.8%76 pct
Chances for per 601.8831 pct2.7565 pct
Chances against per 603.855 pct1.7774 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.3778 pct−0.463 pct
Creates per 60+0.3079 pct−0.491 pct
Prevents per 60+0.0758 pct+0.0349 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 555 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →