Skip to content

Oliver Ekman-Larsson vs Luca Cagnoni

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Luca Cagnoni is ahead on 7 of 13 measures. The widest gap is chances for per 60: Oliver Ekman-Larsson sits in the 69th percentile, Luca Cagnoni the 6th.

MeasureEkman-LarssonCagnoni
Scoring · NHL
Points02
Goals01
Assists01
Ice time per game16:5520:33
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.0423 pct0.1660 pct
Shot attempts per game1.326 pct2.767 pct
Goals above expected−0.144 pct+0.580 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share59.3%69 pct29.1%7 pct
Chances for per 602.8969 pct1.136 pct
Chances against per 601.9863 pct2.7431 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.0727 pct−0.454 pct
Creates per 60−0.1023 pct−0.324 pct
Prevents per 60+0.0348 pct−0.1320 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 540 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →