Skip to content

Victor Hedman vs Joel Farabee

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Joel Farabee is ahead on 10 of 12 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Joel Farabee sits in the 64th percentile, Victor Hedman the 10th.

MeasureHedmanFarabee
Scoring · NHL
Points02
Goals00
Assists02
Ice time per game15:4016:12
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.0734 pct0.1968 pct
Shot attempts per game2.046 pct3.376 pct
Goals above expected−0.143 pct−0.611 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share47.2%42 pct58.5%68 pct
Chances for per 603.8894 pct3.3887 pct
Chances against per 604.343 pct2.4044 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.3010 pct+0.2264 pct
Creates per 60−0.0529 pct+0.3383 pct
Prevents per 60−0.257 pct−0.1122 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 519 skaters who have at least 18 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →