Skip to content

Ryan McDonagh vs Mika Zibanejad

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Mika Zibanejad is ahead on 8 of 13 measures. The widest gap is expected goals per game: Mika Zibanejad sits in the 76th percentile, Ryan McDonagh the 3rd.

MeasureMcDonaghZibanejad
Scoring · NHL
Points03
Goals01
Assists02
Ice time per game15:4020:49
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.003 pct0.2476 pct
Shot attempts per game0.33 pct2.560 pct
Goals above expected0.065 pct0.069 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share65.6%85 pct57.1%63 pct
Chances for per 602.5458 pct2.6964 pct
Chances against per 601.3390 pct2.0260 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.2869 pct−0.0432 pct
Creates per 60−0.0136 pct−0.0429 pct
Prevents per 60+0.2993 pct+0.0144 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 532 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →