Nick Foligno vs Jake Middleton
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Change first player
Wild skaters
- Matt Boldy
- Kirill Kaprizov
- Quinn Hughes
- Blake Coleman
- Joel Eriksson Ek
- Maxim Shabanov
- Bobby Brink
- Marcus Foligno
- Danila Yurov
- Michael McCarron
- Nick Foligno
- Yakov Trenin
- Ryan Hartman
- Olli Maatta
- Jared Spurgeon
- Daemon Hunt
- Zach Bogosian
- Jonas Brodin
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- Kyle Connor
- Vasily Podkolzin
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Alex Tuch
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Steven Stamkos
- Adrian Kempe
- Cole Perfetti
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Beckett Sennecke
- Clayton Keller
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Cutter Gauthier
Another club (its chance leader)
Change second player
Flames skaters
- Mikael Backlund
- Morgan Frost
- Zayne Parekh
- Simon Nemec
- Joel Farabee
- Ryan Strome
- Matvei Gridin
- Matt Coronato
- Adam Klapka
- Connor Zary
- Jake Middleton
- Samuel Honzek
- Martin Pospisil
- Yegor Sharangovich
- Maxim Tsyplakov
- Zach Whitecloud
- Yan Kuznetsov
- Kevin Bahl
- Brennan Othmann
- Joel Hanley
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- Kyle Connor
- Vasily Podkolzin
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Alex Tuch
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Steven Stamkos
- Adrian Kempe
- Cole Perfetti
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Beckett Sennecke
- Clayton Keller
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Cutter Gauthier
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
Nick Foligno is ahead on 8 of 12 measures. The widest gap is chances against per 60: Nick Foligno sits in the 90th percentile, Jake Middleton the 22nd.
| Measure | Foligno | Middleton |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 1 | 0 |
| Goals | 1 | 0 |
| Assists | 0 | 0 |
| Ice time per game | 9:57 | 18:27 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.0631 pct | 0.0736 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 1.015 pct | 2.048 pct |
| Goals above expected | +0.889 pct | −0.234 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | 57.0%67 pct | 49.1%44 pct |
| Chances for per 60 | 1.8228 pct | 2.8268 pct |
| Chances against per 60 | 1.3790 pct | 2.9322 pct |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | +0.2061 pct | −0.2314 pct |
| Creates per 60 | +0.0747 pct | −0.2112 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | +0.1373 pct | −0.0238 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 555 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →
