Skip to content

Kris Letang vs Nate Schmidt

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Nate Schmidt is ahead on 7 of 12 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Nate Schmidt sits in the 87th percentile, Kris Letang the 9th.

MeasureLetangSchmidt
Scoring · NHL
Points31
Goals00
Assists31
Ice time per game20:3221:39
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.1148 pct0.0839 pct
Shot attempts per game3.379 pct1.841 pct
Goals above expected−0.324 pct−0.325 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share62.6%81 pct63.0%82 pct
Chances for per 602.6159 pct2.7464 pct
Chances against per 601.5685 pct1.6182 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.329 pct+0.4987 pct
Creates per 60−0.249 pct+0.1763 pct
Prevents per 60−0.0827 pct+0.3296 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 538 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →