Brent Burns vs Shane Wright
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Avalanche · DBrent BurnsChange first player
Avalanche skaters
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Martin Necas
- Artturi Lehkonen
- Nicolas Roy
- Jaden Schwartz
- Cale Makar
- Nazem Kadri
- T.J. Hughes
- Fedor Svechkov
- Sam Malinski
- Brock Nelson
- Parker Kelly
- Brent Burns
- Gabriel Landeskog
- Josh Manson
- Noah Juulsen
- Devon Toews
- Brett Kulak
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Kyle Connor
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Tomas Hertl
- Vasily Podkolzin
- William Eklund
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- Adrian Kempe
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Nick Schmaltz
- Brandon Hagel
- Morgan Geekie
- Will Smith
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Dylan Guenther
- Tyson Foerster
- Clayton Keller
- William Nylander
- Gabriel Vilardi
- Alex Tuch
- Nathan MacKinnon
- David Pastrnak
Another club (its chance leader)
Kraken · CShane WrightChange second player
Kraken skaters
- Jordan Eberle
- Bobby McMann
- Ryan Winterton
- Shane Wright
- Jared McCann
- Berkly Catton
- Brandon Montour
- Frederick Gaudreau
- Chandler Stephenson
- Mackie Samoskevich
- Vince Dunn
- Ryker Evans
- Jacob Melanson
- Kaapo Kakko
- Ryan Lindgren
- Matty Beniers
- Curtis Douglas
- Cale Fleury
- Josh Mahura
- Adam Larsson
- Ville Ottavainen
- Ben Meyers
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Kyle Connor
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Tomas Hertl
- Vasily Podkolzin
- William Eklund
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- Adrian Kempe
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Nick Schmaltz
- Brandon Hagel
- Morgan Geekie
- Will Smith
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Dylan Guenther
- Tyson Foerster
- Clayton Keller
- William Nylander
- Gabriel Vilardi
- Alex Tuch
- Nathan MacKinnon
- David Pastrnak
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
Shane Wright is ahead on 7 of 12 measures. The widest gap is expected goals per game: Shane Wright sits in the 68th percentile, Brent Burns the 33rd.
| Measure | Burns | Wright |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 1 | 2 |
| Goals | 0 | 1 |
| Assists | 1 | 1 |
| Ice time per game | 14:17 | 15:07 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.0633 pct | 0.1968 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 3.072 pct | 2.047 pct |
| Goals above expected | −0.143 pct | +0.477 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | 68.8%91 pct | 56.3%62 pct |
| Chances for per 60 | 3.8994 pct | 2.6260 pct |
| Chances against per 60 | 1.7673 pct | 2.0460 pct |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | −0.0135 pct | +0.0948 pct |
| Creates per 60 | +0.2472 pct | +0.1561 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | −0.257 pct | −0.0630 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 540 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →