Brent Burns vs Alex Vlasic
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Change first player
Avalanche skaters
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Martin Necas
- Artturi Lehkonen
- Nicolas Roy
- Jaden Schwartz
- Cale Makar
- Nazem Kadri
- T.J. Hughes
- Fedor Svechkov
- Sam Malinski
- Brock Nelson
- Parker Kelly
- Brent Burns
- Gabriel Landeskog
- Josh Manson
- Noah Juulsen
- Devon Toews
- Brett Kulak
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Kyle Connor
- Alex Tuch
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Steven Stamkos
- Adrian Kempe
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Clayton Keller
- Tommy Novak
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
Another club (its chance leader)
Change second player
Blackhawks skaters
- Patrick Kane
- Frank Nazar
- Jordan Greenway
- Anton Frondell
- Ryan Donato
- Sam Rinzel
- Artyom Levshunov
- Ryan Greene
- Oliver Moore
- Tyler Bertuzzi
- Roman Kantserov
- Teuvo Teravainen
- Nick Lardis
- Bowen Byram
- Cole Smith
- Wyatt Kaiser
- Alex Vlasic
- Andrew Mangiapane
- Kevin Korchinski
- Ethan Del Mastro
- Ian Cole
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Kyle Connor
- Alex Tuch
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Steven Stamkos
- Adrian Kempe
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Clayton Keller
- Tommy Novak
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
Brent Burns is ahead on 7 of 10 measures. The widest gap is chances for per 60: Brent Burns sits in the 96th percentile, Alex Vlasic the 8th.
| Measure | Burns | Vlasic |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 2 | 2 |
| Goals | 0 | 0 |
| Assists | 2 | 2 |
| Ice time per game | 15:20 | 20:40 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.0631 pct | 0.0315 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 3.073 pct | 1.841 pct |
| Goals above expected | −0.145 pct | −0.147 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | 68.8%94 pct | 29.1%8 pct |
| Chances for per 60 | 3.8996 pct | 1.228 pct |
| Chances against per 60 | 1.7674 pct | 2.9721 pct |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | −0.0135 pct | −0.3011 pct |
| Creates per 60 | +0.2473 pct | −0.373 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | −0.267 pct | +0.0758 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 548 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →
