Brent Burns vs J.T. Compher
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Change first player
Avalanche skaters
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Martin Necas
- Artturi Lehkonen
- Nicolas Roy
- Jaden Schwartz
- Cale Makar
- Nazem Kadri
- T.J. Hughes
- Fedor Svechkov
- Sam Malinski
- Brock Nelson
- Parker Kelly
- Brent Burns
- Gabriel Landeskog
- Josh Manson
- Noah Juulsen
- Devon Toews
- Brett Kulak
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Kyle Connor
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Steven Stamkos
- Adrian Kempe
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Clayton Keller
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Auston Matthews
- Sebastian Aho
Another club (its chance leader)
Change second player
Red Wings skaters
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Viktor Arvidsson
- Emmitt Finnie
- Lucas Raymond
- Dylan Larkin
- Alex DeBrincat
- Moritz Seider
- Michael Rasmussen
- Andrew Copp
- Justin Faulk
- Carter Mazur
- Axel Sandin-Pellikka
- Nate Danielson
- Marco Kasper
- J.T. Compher
- Ben Chiarot
- Albert Johansson
- Keegan Kolesar
- Anton Johansson
- Mason Appleton
- Andreas Englund
- William Wallinder
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Kyle Connor
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Steven Stamkos
- Adrian Kempe
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Clayton Keller
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Auston Matthews
- Sebastian Aho
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
Brent Burns is ahead on 9 of 12 measures. The widest gap is chances for per 60: Brent Burns sits in the 95th percentile, J.T. Compher the 28th.
| Measure | Burns | Compher |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 1 | 0 |
| Goals | 0 | 0 |
| Assists | 1 | 0 |
| Ice time per game | 14:17 | 14:40 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.0632 pct | 0.0732 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 3.073 pct | 2.047 pct |
| Goals above expected | −0.144 pct | −0.144 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | 68.8%93 pct | 46.3%37 pct |
| Chances for per 60 | 3.8995 pct | 1.7928 pct |
| Chances against per 60 | 1.7673 pct | 2.0760 pct |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | −0.0136 pct | −0.1719 pct |
| Creates per 60 | +0.2474 pct | −0.0529 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | −0.267 pct | −0.1221 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 543 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →
