NHL Team Explorer
Does a club that out-shoots its opponents also out-score them? Who creates chances and gives few back? Put any two team measures on the axes; better is always up and to the right.
2026-27 seasonour ratings are for 2026-27
xGF% against SV%32 clubs
Utah Mammoth have the best combined rank: 1st in team save % (.970) and 6th in expected goals share (5-on-5) (51.3%). 7 of 32 clubs are better than the middle on both. The two barely move together (r = 0.03).
Both measures, rankedordered by the average of the two ranks
| # | Team | SV% | xGF% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | .970#1 | 51.3%#6 | |
| 2 | .931#6 | 51.4%#3 | |
| 3 | .912#12 | 52.8%#1 | |
| 4 | .957#3 | 50.2%#16 | |
| 5 | .921#7 | 50.2%#15 | |
| 6 | .942#4 | 49.5%#20 | |
| 7 | .915#10 | 50.2%#14 | |
| 8 | .886#17 | 50.9%#7 | |
| 9 | .870#23 | 51.7%#2 | |
| 10 | .968#2 | 49.2%#24 | |
| 11 | .877#21 | 51.4%#5 | |
| 12 | .870#22 | 51.4%#4 | |
| 13 | .902#14 | 50.2%#13 | |
| 14 | .920#9 | 49.9%#19 | |
| 15 | .877#20 | 50.7%#9 | |
| 16 | .933#5 | 49.2%#25 | |
| 17 | .900#15 | 50.2%#18 | |
| 18 | .920#8 | 49.1%#26 | |
| 19 | .905#13 | 49.4%#23 | |
| 20 | .880#19 | 50.2%#17 | |
| 21 | .913#11 | 48.6%#27 | |
| 22 | .860#26 | 50.4%#12 | |
| 23 | .763#31 | 50.9%#8 | |
| 24 | .785#30 | 50.7%#10 | |
| 25 | .759#32 | 50.7%#11 | |
| 26 | .893#16 | 48.5%#28 | |
| 27 | .867#24 | 49.4%#21 | |
| 28 | .862#25 | 49.4%#22 | |
| 29 | .885#18 | 48.3%#30 | |
| 30 | .828#29 | 48.4%#29 | |
| 31 | .845#27 | 46.6%#32 | |
| 32 | .837#28 | 47.9%#31 |
What the two axes are
Team save %. One minus goals against over shots against, for the whole club. Empty-net goals count against it, so it reads a little lower than the goalies' own save percentages.
Expected goals share (5-on-5). The club's share of expected goals at five-on-five, from our shot model. Blocked shots are not counted.
A lower-is-better measure is drawn with its axis flipped, so the best clubs are always up and to the right. The dashed lines are the league median; r is how closely the two measures move together across the 32 clubs. Methodology →
