NHL Team Explorer
Does a club that out-shoots its opponents also out-score them? Who creates chances and gives few back? Put any two team measures on the axes; better is always up and to the right.
2026-27 seasonour ratings are for 2026-27
xGF% against xGA − GA32 clubs
Utah Mammoth have the best combined rank: 6th in goaltending above chances per game (+0.66) and 5th in expected goals share (5-on-5) (51.5%). 6 of 32 clubs are better than the middle on both. The two barely move together (r = -0.01).
Both measures, rankedordered by the average of the two ranks
| # | Team | xGA − GA | xGF% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Mammoth | +0.66#6 | 51.5%#5 |
| 2 |  Lightning | +0.36#12 | 51.9%#3 |
| 3 |  Stars | +0.59#7 | 50.8%#9 |
| 4 |  Senators | +0.52#10 | 51.1%#7 |
| 5 |  Capitals | +1.08#3 | 50.2%#16 |
| 6 |  Panthers | +0.53#9 | 50.6%#12 |
| 7 |  Wild | +1.09#2 | 49.7%#20 |
| 8 |  Golden Knights | −0.38#20 | 52.3%#2 |
| 9 |  Avalanche | −0.52#22 | 53.0%#1 |
| 10 |  Islanders | +1.46#1 | 49.2%#23 |
| 11 |  Rangers | +1.08#4 | 49.4%#21 |
| 12 |  Hurricanes | −0.55#23 | 51.7%#4 |
| 13 |  Jets | +0.75#5 | 48.8%#26 |
| 14 |  Bruins | +0.10#14 | 50.0%#17 |
| 15 |  Blues | −0.11#17 | 50.5%#14 |
| 16 |  Penguins | −0.61#24 | 50.9%#8 |
| 17 |  Red Wings | −0.01#15 | 49.9%#18 |
| 18 |  Sabres | −1.39#28 | 51.3%#6 |
| 19 |  Maple Leafs | +0.56#8 | 48.5%#27 |
| 20 |  Kraken | +0.46#11 | 49.1%#24 |
| 21 |  Predators | +0.14#13 | 49.3%#22 |
| 22 |  Blue Jackets | −0.79#25 | 50.7%#10 |
| 23 |  Ducks | −0.30#19 | 49.9%#19 |
| 24 |  Oilers | −1.55#30 | 50.7%#11 |
| 25 |  Devils | −1.27#27 | 50.2%#15 |
| 26 |  Flyers | −0.02#16 | 48.0%#29 |
| 27 |  Kings | −2.57#32 | 50.5%#13 |
| 28 |  Sharks | −0.12#18 | 47.7%#30 |
| 29 |  Blackhawks | −0.48#21 | 46.4%#32 |
| 30 |  Canadiens | −1.52#29 | 49.0%#25 |
| 31 |  Canucks | −1.26#26 | 47.4%#31 |
| 32 |  Flames | −1.98#31 | 48.4%#28 |
What the two axes are
Goaltending above chances per game. Expected goals against minus goals allowed, per game this season, empty net left out: what the goalies have saved beyond an average goalie on the same shots. Unlike the rating beside it, this is what happened, not pulled toward average.
Expected goals share (5-on-5). The club's share of expected goals at five-on-five, from our shot model. Blocked shots are not counted.
A lower-is-better measure is drawn with its axis flipped, so the best clubs are always up and to the right. The dashed lines are the league median; r is how closely the two measures move together across the 32 clubs. Methodology →