NHL Team Explorer
Does a club that out-shoots its opponents also out-score them? Who creates chances and gives few back? Put any two team measures on the axes; better is always up and to the right.
2026-27 seasonour ratings are for 2026-27
SV% against FO%32 clubs
Utah Mammoth have the best combined rank: 5th in faceoff % (56.9%) and 1st in team save % (.970). 8 of 32 clubs are better than the middle on both. The two barely move together (r = -0.06).
Both measures, rankedordered by the average of the two ranks
| # | Team | FO% | SV% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 56.9%#5 | .970#1 | |
| 2 | 56.9%#4 | .931#6 | |
| 3 | 53.0%#9 | .933#5 | |
| 4 | 52.6%#11 | .942#4 | |
| 5 | 49.6%#17 | .957#3 | |
| 6 | 48.5%#20 | .968#2 | |
| 7 | 53.0%#10 | .905#13 | |
| 8 | 53.5%#8 | .893#16 | |
| 9 | 50.0%#15 | .920#9 | |
| 10 | 57.0%#3 | .870#23 | |
| 11 | 55.9%#6 | .877#20 | |
| 12 | 54.5%#7 | .880#19 | |
| 13 | 50.0%#16 | .915#10 | |
| 14 | 57.9%#2 | .862#25 | |
| 15 | 47.0%#24 | .920#8 | |
| 16 | 58.2%#1 | .759#32 | |
| 17 | 47.0%#23 | .913#11 | |
| 18 | 46.4%#27 | .921#7 | |
| 19 | 51.4%#14 | .877#21 | |
| 20 | 46.8%#26 | .912#12 | |
| 21 | 49.5%#18 | .870#22 | |
| 22 | 51.7%#12 | .785#30 | |
| 23 | 51.7%#13 | .828#29 | |
| 24 | 42.9%#29 | .900#15 | |
| 25 | 41.1%#31 | .902#14 | |
| 26 | 48.3%#22 | .867#24 | |
| 27 | 44.9%#28 | .885#18 | |
| 28 | 49.2%#19 | .837#28 | |
| 29 | 41.3%#30 | .886#17 | |
| 30 | 46.9%#25 | .860#26 | |
| 31 | 48.4%#21 | .763#31 | |
| 32 | 39.9%#32 | .845#27 |
What the two axes are
Faceoff %. Share of faceoffs won, all zones and situations.
Team save %. One minus goals against over shots against, for the whole club. Empty-net goals count against it, so it reads a little lower than the goalies' own save percentages.
A lower-is-better measure is drawn with its axis flipped, so the best clubs are always up and to the right. The dashed lines are the league median; r is how closely the two measures move together across the 32 clubs. Methodology →
