Wagner vs. Sacred Heart: Final Score & Recap
Final score, recap & advanced stats

Wagner0-1
▸
Sacred Heart
Final
Campus FieldConference game
WAGNTeam statsSACR
219Total yards342
86Pass110
133Rush232
13First downs21
8-193rd down2-11
1Turnovers3
27:47Possession32:13
- Q4 2:32SACRSam Renzi 24 Yd Field Goal 17–10
- Q4 14:31SACRJalen Madison 2 Yd Run (Sam Renzi Kick)17–7
- Q3 8:52WAGNJustin Wolf 10 Yd pass from Steven Krajewski (Ryan Liszner Kick)17–0
- Q2 0:00WAGNRyan Liszner 42 Yd Field Goal 10–0
- Q2 6:01WAGNJunior Wily 52 Yd Interception Return (Ryan Liszner Kick)7–0
How the model called it
Market line
SACR −11.5
Against the number
WAGN covered
line SACR −11.5
What the numbers say
- WAGN played behind the sticks — third downs that long convert rarely, and SACR did not face the same ones. 3rd & 8.2 vs 3rd & 6.0
Kickoff159 plays →Final
Tap or hover on the chart to see play details
SACR (top)WAGN (bottom)· colored dots = scoresFinal: SACR 0%
Closing line
SACR −11.5
Closing total
39.5
Model line
—
Actual result
WAGN 17 – 10 SACR
Wagner
- PassSteven Krajewski 10/26, 86 YDS, 1 TD, 1 INT
- RushZach Palmer-Smith 24 CAR, 89 YDS
- RecTrevor Shorter 2 REC, 45 YDS
Sacred Heart
- PassRob McCoy Jr. 8/18, 81 YDS, 1 INT
- RushMalik Grant 27 CAR, 133 YDS
- RecMalik Grant 3 REC, 40 YDS
24.9sper snap · in line with the national 24.5s
fastnational avgslow
Snaps run
140
Points / snap
0.19
This exact spot, historically
empirical, no ratingsWAGN up 17 entering the 4th quarter. Across 839 historically comparable game states (within ±2 pts and ±3 min, from 3,056 games):
97%
WAGN went on to win
A near-lock historically
FAQ
What was the final score of Wagner vs. Sacred Heart?
Wagner 17, Sacred Heart 10.
Did Gridpex's model pick hit?
No — the model picked SACR, which didn't hit. We report the misses too.
WAGN
SACR
29%
Success rate
47%
-0.27
EPA / pass
-0.47
-0.06
EPA / rush
0.13
24%
Early-down success
53%
26%
Pass success
48%
32%
Rush success
46%
5%
Explosive play rate (15+ yds)
8%
21%
Stuffed rush rate
15%
42%
Pass rate
39%
8.2
Avg 3rd-down distance
6.0
WAGN
8.2 yards to go on 3rd down
65 scrimmage snaps
SACR
6.0 yards to go on 3rd down
75 scrimmage snaps
| WAGN | SACR | |
|---|---|---|
| 219 | Total yards | 342 |
| 86 | Passing yards | 110 |
| 133 | Rushing yards | 232 |
| 13 | First downs | 21 |
| 8-19 | 3rd down | 2-11 |
| 0-1 | 4th down | 1-3 |
| 10/27 | Comp/Att | 12/27 |
| 3.2 | Yards per pass | 4.1 |
| 3.4 | Yards per rush | 4.9 |
| 1 | Turnovers | 3 |
| 3-25 | Penalties | 4-40 |
| 27:47 | Possession | 32:13 |
WAGN
6/9 with the model
−1.2 pts · −0.0% win prob
SACR
3/8 with the model
−4.4 pts · −0.0% win prob
Costliest call
Q2 1:27 SACR punt on 4th & 1 at SACR 46. The model preferred go for it, a gap of 1.36 points.
Drive chart
every possession, start to finishWAGN 2/12 scoring drives← own end zone →SACR 3/12 scoring drives
WAGNPUNT5 pl, 14 yds· own 30Q1
SACRINT8 pl, 33 yds· own 19Q1
WAGNDOWNS5 pl, 24 yds· own 42Q1
SACRPUNT3 pl, 9 yds· own 34Q1
WAGNPUNT6 pl, 21 yds· own 2Q1
SACRPUNT8 pl, 23 yds· own 40Q1
WAGNPUNT6 pl, 13 yds· own 2Q2
SACRINT4 pl, 15 yds· own 30Q2
WAGNPUNT3 pl, 1 yds· opp 43Q2
SACRTD5 pl, 80 yds· own 20Q2
SACRPUNT3 pl, 4 yds· own 25Q2
WAGNINT4 pl, 14 yds· own 44Q2
SACRPUNT3 pl, 9 yds· own 37Q2
WAGNFG9 pl, 50 yds· own 26Q2
SACRPUNT3 pl, 1 yds· own 25Q3
WAGNTD12 pl, 56 yds· own 44Q3
SACRDOWNS14 pl, 47 yds· own 23Q3
WAGNPUNT3 pl, 2 yds· own 30Q3
SACRTD9 pl, 77 yds· own 23Q3
WAGNPUNT5 pl, 13 yds· own 25Q4
SACRDOWNS9 pl, 37 yds· own 34Q4
WAGNPUNT3 pl, 2 yds· own 29Q4
SACRFG8 pl, 55 yds· own 38Q4
WAGNUncateg6 pl, 16 yds· opp 45Q4
- Q4 2:32SACRSam Renzi 24 Yd Field Goal 17–10
- Q4 14:31SACRJalen Madison 2 Yd Run (Sam Renzi Kick)17–7
- Q3 8:52WAGNJustin Wolf 10 Yd pass from Steven Krajewski (Ryan Liszner Kick)17–0
- Q2 0:00WAGNRyan Liszner 42 Yd Field Goal 10–0
- Q2 6:01WAGNJunior Wily 52 Yd Interception Return (Ryan Liszner Kick)7–0
Model prediction
how the number is builtOne or both teams lack a power rating (often an FCS opponent), so the model prediction is low-confidence for this game.
Where this number comes from. Every projection on this page is produced by the same model, run before kickoff on opponent-adjusted efficiency, power ratings and situational data — walk-forward validated on eleven seasons and never adjusted after the fact. How the model works →
