Which is the best college football conference in 2014?

AnalysisAll analysis →

Every FBS team is a dot. Conference averages are not shown, and that is the point: the SEC’s mean is dragged up by four teams, the Big Ten’s spread is twice the Sun Belt’s, and a bar chart of means says none of it. What “compare the conferences” actually asks is how much of one league sits inside the other.

MetricCORE overallCORE offenseCORE defenseOffense EPA/playDefense EPA/play allowedOffense success rateOffense explosivenessPoints per drivePoints per drive allowedAverage starting field positionThird down conversionTeam talent composite

Season2026202520242023202220212020201920182017201620152014

Average starting field position · 2014

One dot per team, one tick per conference median. Leagues are ordered by median, and the mean is deliberately not shown — four teams drag it and it hides how far the two distributions overlap.

All leagues ACC American Athletic Big 12 Big Ten Conference USA FBS Independents Mid-American Mountain West Pac-12 SEC Sun Belt

Conference	Teams	Median	Spread	Best	Worst
Big Ten	14	32.2	2.8	Nebraska 37.6	29.3
Conference USA	13	31.6	3.6	Louisiana Tech 36.2	27.6
ACC	14	31.3	3.2	Duke 34.8	26.1
SEC	14	31.0	3.7	Florida 35.3	28.8
Pac-12	12	30.8	2.6	Arizona State 34.4	27.1
Sun Belt	11	30.6	3.4	Arkansas State 33.0	26.1
FBS Independents	4	30.5	3.0	Notre Dame 33.1	29.1
Mountain West	12	30.0	2.8	San Diego State 32.6	26.3
American Athletic	11	29.7	3.4	Memphis 35.4	27.2
Mid-American	13	29.5	2.5	Akron 33.9	28.1
Big 12	10	29.4	3.8	TCU 35.5	27.7

Two numbers, not one

Median answers “how good is this league”. Spread — the interquartile range — answers “how evenly good”, and it is usually the more interesting of the two. A league with a high median and a huge spread is four contenders and eight teams padding their records, which is exactly the shape that produces a conference champion who keeps losing in January.

Note which metric you are looking at. CORE is opponent-adjusted, so it can be compared across leagues honestly. The raw metrics cannot: a conference that plays itself twelve times has its schedule strength baked into every raw number, which is the single most common way conference comparisons go wrong.