Skip to content

Which is the best college football conference in 2017?

Analysis

Every FBS team is a dot. Conference averages are not shown, and that is the point: the SEC’s mean is dragged up by four teams, the Big Ten’s spread is twice the Sun Belt’s, and a bar chart of means says none of it. What “compare the conferences” actually asks is how much of one league sits inside the other.

Third down conversion · 2017

FBS medianAmerican Athlet…Pac-12SECConference USAFBS IndependentsACCMid-AmericanMountain WestSun BeltBig 12Big Ten

One dot per team, one tick per conference median. Leagues are ordered by median, and the mean is deliberately not shown — four teams drag it and it hides how far the two distributions overlap.

ConferenceTeamsMedianSpreadBest
American Athletic1243.9%3.9%UCF 46.6%
Pac-121242.9%1.4%Washington 45.7%
SEC1441.6%7.8%Mississippi State 47.2%
Conference USA1440.8%6.1%UAB 46.2%
FBS Independents440.1%18.6%Army 55.1%
ACC1439.9%8.7%Georgia Tech 47.1%
Mid-American1239.6%3.5%Ohio 43.2%
Mountain West1239.6%10.6%Colorado State 51.1%
Sun Belt1239.4%9.0%Arkansas State 45.4%
Big 121039.3%11.3%TCU 47.4%
Big Ten1435.2%12.8%Wisconsin 49.2%

Two numbers, not one

Median answers “how good is this league”. Spread — the interquartile range — answers “how evenly good”, and it is usually the more interesting of the two. A league with a high median and a huge spread is four contenders and eight teams padding their records, which is exactly the shape that produces a conference champion who keeps losing in January.

Note which metric you are looking at. CORE is opponent-adjusted, so it can be compared across leagues honestly. The raw metrics cannot: a conference that plays itself twelve times has its schedule strength baked into every raw number, which is the single most common way conference comparisons go wrong.