Skip to content

Which is the best college football conference in 2017?

Analysis

Every FBS team is a dot. Conference averages are not shown, and that is the point: the SEC’s mean is dragged up by four teams, the Big Ten’s spread is twice the Sun Belt’s, and a bar chart of means says none of it. What “compare the conferences” actually asks is how much of one league sits inside the other.

CORE defense · 2017

FBS medianBig TenSECACCBig 12Pac-12FBS IndependentsMid-AmericanConference USASun BeltAmerican Athlet…Mountain West

One dot per team, one tick per conference median. Leagues are ordered by median, and the mean is deliberately not shown — four teams drag it and it hides how far the two distributions overlap.

ConferenceTeamsMedianSpreadBest
Big Ten14-8.415.5Michigan -19.3
SEC14-5.616.8Alabama -23.9
ACC14-4.811.8Clemson -23.8
Big 1210-2.57.9Texas -18.0
Pac-12120.32511.3Washington State -11.9
FBS Independents42.911.0Notre Dame -10.9
Mid-American124.07.5Northern Illinois -9.3
Conference USA144.19.4Marshall -5.1
Sun Belt124.98.4Troy -6.3
American Athletic125.713.0South Florida -9.9
Mountain West1210.818.8San Diego State -8.0

Two numbers, not one

Median answers “how good is this league”. Spread — the interquartile range — answers “how evenly good”, and it is usually the more interesting of the two. A league with a high median and a huge spread is four contenders and eight teams padding their records, which is exactly the shape that produces a conference champion who keeps losing in January.

Note which metric you are looking at. CORE is opponent-adjusted, so it can be compared across leagues honestly. The raw metrics cannot: a conference that plays itself twelve times has its schedule strength baked into every raw number, which is the single most common way conference comparisons go wrong.