Scores
Dev
Go Pro
← Player leaders
Chris Dawn Jr.

#1Chris Dawn Jr.

Chris Dawn Jr. is a Versatile WR for Texas State. Chris's 2024 season produced 23.1 total EPA across 42 plays.

2024 Production

Receiving
37 Receptions418 Rec yards6 Rec TD11.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs WR peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyPass-Down
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency50th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.76 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 2.19 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs UTSA (SP+ 2).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh2016630.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force2021600.4701.328.2
Savion WilliamsTCU2024560.4501.125.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State2017700.4601.232.2
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic2020530.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Lamar: +0.04 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs UTSA: +2.19 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Arizona State: +0.19 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Sam Houston: +0.47 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Arkansas State: +1.34 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Old Dominion: -0.37 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Louisiana: -0.00 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Southern Miss: -0.34 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Georgia State: +0.63 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs South Alabama: +0.59 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs North Texas: +0.04 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsLamarW34-272136.5080.04
2vsUTSAW49-102.2515030.02602.19
3vsArizona StateL28-319.43217.0190.19
5vsSam HoustonL39-40-6.933812.70190.47
6@TroyW38-17-6.611515.0015
7vsArkansas StateW41-9-9.946716.80241.34
8@Old DominionL14-24-6.02105.005-0.37
10vsLouisianaL17-234.83103.306-0.00
12vsSouthern MissW58-3-25.6242.004-0.34
13vsGeorgia StateL44-52-17.95428.43170.63
14@South AlabamaW45-382.83175.7080.59
1vsNorth TexasW30-28-4.54317.80130.04

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
6.4%
Passing plays
13.6%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
6.1%
Passing downs
7.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.24
Passing downs
1.25
Pass / Rush EPA
0.55 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.